Compare Monitors

Asus MX259H vs BenQ GL2460HM

Save comparison
Prices
(Change region)
Prices
(Change region)
* Pangoly may earn a commission when you use one of the links to make a purchase. (Disclosure)
* Product prices and availability are subject to change frequently. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Pangoly Score (How do we rate?)
-
Pangoly Score (How do we rate?)
81
Brand
Asus
Brand
BenQ
Model
MX259H
Model
GL2460HM
Release Date
📅 September 2018
Release Date
📅 April 2014
* First availability for purchase, it may not correspond to the actual market launch date.
User reviews
User reviews
★★★★★
(119 reviews)
Price history
View Details ►
Price history
View Details ►
Pros
-
Pros
  • Fast response time
  • Low price
  • Good image quality (for a TN)
Cons
-
Cons
  • Tight viewing angles
Screen Size
25"
Screen Size
24"
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Pixel Density
88.12 PPI
Pixel Density
91.79 PPI
Dot Pitch
0.28 mm
Dot Pitch
0.27 mm
Panel Type
IPS
Panel Type
TN
Widescreen
Yes
Widescreen
Yes
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Curved Screen
No
Curved Screen
No
Viewing Angle
178° H x 178° V
Viewing Angle
170° H x 160° V
Display Colors
16700000
Display Colors
-
Brightness
250 cd/m²
Brightness
250 cd/m²
Contrast Ratio
80,000,000:1
Contrast Ratio
1000:1
Response Time
5 ms
Response Time
2 ms
Refresh Rate
60 Hz
Refresh Rate
60 Hz
Built-in Speakers
Yes
Built-in Speakers
Yes
DVI
0
DVI
0
DisplayPort
0
DisplayPort
0
HDMI
2
HDMI
1
VGA
1
VGA
1
G-SYNC Support
No
G-SYNC Support
No
FreeSync Support
No
FreeSync Support
No

What are the differences between Asus MX259H and BenQ GL2460HM? Analyze head-to-head all specifications and features to find out the better monitor.

Comparison and key differences summary

Reasons to pick the Asus MX259H:

  • Newer Product, it was released around 5 years later.
  • Bigger screen size (+1.00").
  • Better viewing angle.
  • +1 Ports HDMI.

Buy now

Reasons to pick the BenQ GL2460HM:

  • Better pixel density (91.79 PPI).
  • Less response time (-3.00 ms).

Buy now

Have you found incorrect information on this page? Contact us and we will fix it as soon as possible.

Trending comparisons (Monitors)




x