Compare Monitors

Compare ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K vs TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A

ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A are both monitors with the same Panel Type (IPS), Aspect Ratio (16:9) and Viewing Angle (178° H x 178° V). The main differences are in Screen Size, Resolution, Pixel Density and Dot Pitch.
Save comparison
Prices
(Change region)
Out of Stock
Free shipping
In Stock
Free shipping
In Stock
Free shipping
Prices
(Change region)
* Pangoly may earn a commission when you use one of the links to make a purchase. (Disclosure)
* Product prices and availability are subject to change frequently. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Brand
ASUS
Brand
ASUS
Model
  • PA32UCG-K
  • 90LM03H0-B05370
Model
  • VG27AQ5A
  • 90LM0BN0-B013B1
Release Date
📅 June 2021
Release Date
📅 July 2025
* First availability for purchase, it may not correspond to the actual market launch date.
User reviews
User reviews
Price history
View Details ►
Price history
View Details ►
Screen Size
32"
Screen Size
27"
Resolution
3840 x 2160
Resolution
2560 x 1440
Pixel Density
137.68 PPI
Pixel Density
108.79 PPI
Dot Pitch
0.18 mm
Dot Pitch
0.23 mm
Panel Type
IPS
Panel Type
IPS
Widescreen
Yes
Widescreen
Yes
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Curved Screen
No
Curved Screen
No
Viewing Angle
178° H x 178° V
Viewing Angle
178° H x 178° V
Brightness
1000 cd/m²
Brightness
300 cd/m²
Response Time
5 ms
Response Time
1 ms
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Refresh Rate
210 Hz
Built-in Speakers
No
Built-in Speakers
Yes
DVI
0
DVI
0
DisplayPort
1
DisplayPort
1
HDMI
3
HDMI
2
VGA
0
VGA
0
G-SYNC Support
No
G-SYNC Support
No
FreeSync Support
Yes
FreeSync Support
Yes
-

Comparison and key differences summary

Reasons to buy the ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K:

  • Bigger screen size (+5.00")
  • Higher Screen Resolution (3840 x 2160 pixel)
  • Better pixel density (137.68 PPI)
  • More brightness (+700 cd/m²)
  • +1 Ports HDMI

Buy now

Reasons to buy the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A:

  • Newer Product, it was released around 4 years later
  • Less response time (-4.00 ms)
  • Higher refresh rate (210 Hz)
  • Built-in speakers

Buy now

Have you found incorrect information on this page? Contact us and we will fix it as soon as possible.

Trending comparisons (Monitors)

x