Compare Monitors

Compare CORSAIR XENEON 32UHD144 vs XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240

CORSAIR XENEON 32UHD144 and CORSAIR XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 are both monitors with the same Viewing Angle (178° H x 178° V), DisplayPort (1) and HDMI (2). The main differences are in Screen Size, Resolution, Pixel Density and Dot Pitch.
Save comparison
Prices
(Change region)
Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Free shipping
Out of Stock
Free shipping
Show 1 more offers
Prices
(Change region)
Out of Stock
Free shipping
Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Free shipping
Show 1 more offers
* Pangoly may earn a commission when you use one of the links to make a purchase. (Disclosure)
Brand
Corsair
Brand
Corsair
Model
  • CM-9020003-NA
  • CM-9020003-PE
  • CM-9020003-AU
Model
  • CM-9030001-NA
  • CM-9030001-PE
  • CM-9030001-AU
Release Date
-
Release Date
📅 December 2022
* First availability for purchase, it may not correspond to the actual market launch date.
User reviews
User reviews
Price history
View Details ►
Price history
View Details ►
Screen Size
32"
Screen Size
45"
Resolution
3840 x 2160
Resolution
3440 x 1440
Pixel Density
137.68 PPI
Pixel Density
82.87 PPI
Dot Pitch
0.18 mm
Dot Pitch
0.3 mm
Panel Type
IPS
Panel Type
OLED
Widescreen
Yes
Widescreen
Yes
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Aspect Ratio
21:9
Curved Screen
No
Curved Screen
Yes
Viewing Angle
178° H x 178° V
Viewing Angle
178° H x 178° V
Brightness
400 cd/m²
Brightness
1000 cd/m²
Response Time
12 ms
Response Time
0.03 ms
Response Time MPRT
1 ms
Response Time MPRT
-
Refresh Rate
144 Hz
Refresh Rate
240 Hz
Built-in Speakers
No
Built-in Speakers
No
DVI
0
DVI
0
DisplayPort
1
DisplayPort
1
HDMI
2
HDMI
2
VGA
0
VGA
0
G-SYNC Support
Yes
G-SYNC Support
Yes
FreeSync Support
Yes
FreeSync Support
Yes

Comparison and key differences summary

Reasons to buy the CORSAIR XENEON 32UHD144:

  • 66% cheaper, you can save $1,321.99
  • Higher Screen Resolution (3840 x 2160 pixel)
  • Better pixel density (137.68 PPI)
  • Flat screen

Buy now

Reasons to buy the CORSAIR XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240:

  • Bigger screen size (+13.00")
  • More brightness (+600 cd/m²)
  • Less response time (-11.97 ms)
  • Higher refresh rate (240 Hz)
  • Curved screen

Buy now

Have you found incorrect information on this page? Contact us and we will fix it as soon as possible.

Trending comparisons (Monitors)

x