Compare Monitors

Compare Sony INZONE M9 II vs GIGABYTE GO27Q24G

Sony INZONE M9 II and GIGABYTE GO27Q24G are both monitors with the same Screen Size (27"), Aspect Ratio (16:9) and Viewing Angle (178° H x 178° V). The main differences are in Resolution, Pixel Density, Dot Pitch and Panel Type.
Save comparison
Prices
(Change region)
In Stock
In Stock
Free shipping
Prices
(Change region)
In Stock
$399.99
Last updated 49 minutes ago.
In Stock
* Pangoly may earn a commission when you use one of the links to make a purchase. (Disclosure)
* Product prices and availability are subject to change frequently. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Brand
Sony
Brand
GIGABYTE
Model
  • SDM27U9M2
  • SDM-27U9M2
  • sdm27u9m2b
Model
  • GO27Q24G
  • GO27Q24G EK
Release Date
📅 September 2024
Release Date
📅 March 2026
* First availability for purchase, it may not correspond to the actual market launch date.
User reviews
User reviews
Price history
View Details ►
Price history
View Details ►
Screen Size
27"
Screen Size
27"
Resolution
3840 x 2160
Resolution
2560 x 1440
Pixel Density
163.18 PPI
Pixel Density
108.79 PPI
Dot Pitch
0.15 mm
Dot Pitch
0.23 mm
Panel Type
IPS
Panel Type
WOLED
Widescreen
Yes
Widescreen
Yes
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Aspect Ratio
16:9
Curved Screen
No
Curved Screen
No
Viewing Angle
178° H x 178° V
Viewing Angle
178° H x 178° V
Brightness
400 cd/m²
Brightness
275 cd/m²
Response Time
1 ms
Response Time
0.03 ms
Refresh Rate
160 Hz
Refresh Rate
240 Hz
Built-in Speakers
Yes
Built-in Speakers
No
DVI
0
DVI
0
DisplayPort
1
DisplayPort
1
HDMI
2
HDMI
2
VGA
0
VGA
0
G-SYNC Support
Yes
G-SYNC Support
Yes
FreeSync Support
Yes
FreeSync Support
Yes

Comparison and key differences summary

Reasons to buy the Sony INZONE M9 II:

  • Higher Screen Resolution (3840 x 2160 pixel)
  • Better pixel density (163.18 PPI)
  • More brightness (+125 cd/m²)
  • Built-in speakers

Buy now

Reasons to buy the GIGABYTE GO27Q24G:

  • 53% cheaper, you can save $448.01
  • Newer Product, it was released around 17 months later
  • Less response time (-0.97 ms)
  • Higher refresh rate (240 Hz)

Buy now

Have you found incorrect information on this page? Contact us and we will fix it as soon as possible.

Trending comparisons (Monitors)

x